America, Youth Champions of the World

The 2013 College Cup, the competition that brings the best two-college soccer teams in America together to fight it out for bragging rights as the number one team in the nation. 

Kyle Craft, Harrison Shipp and Andrew O’Malley, heard of them? No, and are you going to be seeing them wearing the red and white hoops under the management of Jurgen Klinsmann any time soon? Probably not, but these three players have just won the national title for Notre Dame Irish after beating the Maryland Terrapins 2-1, and therefore should be considered as the best players in America right now.

The NCAA, national collegiate athletic association, the future of all athletes in America, hoping to take the next step and become an elite sportsman. The NCAA is an organization that hopes to prepare athletes for the next step in sport and life after they leave high school. The strict organization implement many rules such as playing at least one year in college before going on to play basketball in the NBA and at least three years before going on to play in the NFL.

So where does that leave the future of American soccer and the national team one day winning a World Cup?

Because the expectation amongst many soccer players in America is to go onto college and get a degree while playing, the standard in which they are exposed to is not very good. By the time the best players get done with their soccer careers at the college level they are 22, 23 years old. By this age most promising young players in Europe and South America have established themselves in the soccer world and are regulars for top division club across the world. They have a good two to three years professional experience under their belt and know what its like to be playing so that you can afford a mortgage and put food on the table.

                                                                  Notre Dame Irish lifting the 2013 College Cup

The system in America does not look promising for the future of soccer. You don’t see players coming through the Major League Soccer system the same way Ryan Giggs, Gary Neville and Steven Gerrard. No, a player might be with a clubs Academy up to the age of 18, and then they go off to college to enhance their academic side why putting in a few hours each week in training. This is not to mention the rules of college soccer, which are their to develop the promising players into top sports stars.

Granted, that the NCAA say “students” come first, but when that is the route that athletes have to take before going pro, the set up for what is meant to be the next best things in terms of soccer talent would be compared to an under 12 tournament for a group of Sunday league teams.

Roll-on roll-off substitutes and exactly 90 minutes being played that see each half end with a novelty countdown with 10 seconds left on the clock and then an obnoxious air horn being blown to signal the full time whistle. Soccer or a farce to the world’s most played sport?

The standard of referees does not help the game in any shape or form either. What would be considered in England as a great 50/50 tackle is often deemed a reckless challenge, and any sort of verbal retaliation whether directed at the referee or a player on your own team is rewarded with a yellow card.

The College Cup wasn’t short of its poor refereeing decisions either. Hilario Grajeda, voted the 2013 MLS referee of the year saw two handballs inside the penalty area go unpunished. One of which was a clearance off the line in the 35^th minute by a Notre Dame player that should have seen him sent off. Fate must have been on Notre Dame’s side though as in the 67^th minute there was a second obvious handball that went unnoticed. Notre Dame then went on to come from a goal down to finish 2-1 winners.

Despite the poor refereeing decisions it seems like the America culture of wanting to “put on a show” is more important than developing the players of the future. During the first half of the game Maryland’s head coach put on headphones to talk to the two commentators while the game was going on. Can you imagine what people would say if Arsene Wegner put on headphones to talk to Martyn Tyler during the FA Cup Final?

It seems as if the commentators don’t even know what they are talking about either when it comes to the beautiful game. Taylor Twellman, a retired MLS player who had a brief stint with 1860 Munich seems to have all the credentials when it comes to knowing a thing or two about soccer yet a comment during the game left me baffled.

“You can’t play a ball into the 18 yard box with a 5ft-8 goal keeper,” Twellman said.

What does that even mean Taylor? A 5ft-8 goalkeeper is that commanding in the air? The forwards should rely on taking shots from outside the area?

                                                                        Taylor Twellman, the next Martyn Tyler?

The lack of knowledge is the most worrying thing in the future of American soccer, and because of that the standard is affected. I believe a very average team from a council estate could give any college team a run for their money.

Maybe it’s just the culture of America that doesn’t help the development of soccer, as the country is content with three major sports in the shape of basketball, baseball and national football.  Even during the game itself, the biggest spectacle in college soccer didn’t manage to trend on Twitter.

The one thing that can be taken from the Cup is that at least Notre Dame aren’t calling themselves “World Champions” like every sports team that seem to win something in America do.

You're Not Famous Anymore

“You’re not famous anymore,” one of the infamous chants that lower league clubs fans love to chant. Wolves, Coventry, Sheffield United and even Portsmouth are all on the receiving end of this chant when they travel for an away game in the Sky Bet league 1 or 2.

Granted other big name clubs have been through the ups and downs or the re-branding of the football league since the emergence of the Premier League. Leeds United, Nottingham Forest and Leicester City, are all clubs who have languished in the third tier of English football. But all managed to get back into the Championship within three years. .

Of course, the likes of Bradford, Oldham and Swindon had a brief stint in the Premiership, but neither would be considered a “Goliath” fixture in today’s game. Even with their record of being promoted to the top division and back to the basemen in nine years Northampton Town are not a team that are feared.

Like an A-list celebrity that has gone into disrepute and looking for their next comeback, will these clubs ever going to make it back to the top, or has the financial gain of the premiership and television rights spoilt any chances of that?

Relegation is the biggest fear for chairmen who have recently been promoted to the premiership. Even with the parachute payments that their club receives from the premiership; the wage budget, television right and other expenses that come with the fame of playing on in the premiership greatly disappear with relegation. What turns into a season of excitement in England’s top tear often results in the next four to five years struggling in the lower leagues.

Sheffield United the biggest sufferers of the financial reckonings that playing with the big boys brings. Compensated with £5.5m for the Carlo Tevez saga the club has never recovered from that heartbreaking relegation on the final day of the 2006-07 seasons. With sales of promising stars such as Kyle Naughton and Kyle Walker, the club has never quite found it’s feet again when it comes to getting back to the top.

Carlos Tevez playing against Sheffield United in 2007 

And this is just one example of clubs coming down from the top division and not being able to make it back. Financial rewards are what the chairmen are looking for, they don’t care about the fans they just want their stadiums full so they can make as much money as they can.

Tranmere Rovers chairman Peter Johnson is a culprit of this. After a successful era under Ronnie Moore, Johnson decided bringing in the big name reputations of John Barnes and Jason McAteer with the hope to put “more bums and seats.” The thinking that this tactic would work is medieval and something that many clubs in the lower leagues do to try and bring financial success.

The thinking behind running a club has to change however. If a club is going to be run like a business then the least you could do is follow business 101 rules. To gain money from something you have to put money into it. In lower league cases it’s by not selling the young players at the first possible chance. Or sell them and give the manger the money to spend on loan player’s wages. Every player has his price, it’s about knowing when to sell and not look for the quickest possible financial gain.

Johnson’s biggest mistake was sacking Ronnie Moore for what was nothing more than a P.R stunt. A survey done by economist Stefan Szymanski showed that between the years of 1974-2010, Moore was actually the eleventh best manager for what he had achieved with the wage budget he had available. Somewhat of an overachiever Moore was still shown the exit.

Jason McAteer and John Barnes on being appointed Manager and Assistant at Tranmere 

Lower League chairmen need to realize that if they were going to run the clubs like a business then they need to treat the club how they would treat any other business. Instead of trying to find a quick fix look at the long-term plan, results and success in the league bring the fans in, not ex professional players. By giving the managers the resources to succeed on the pitch will bring rewards for more cucumber sandwiches and bottles of white wine in the directors box. For those who are also unaware of the business world of football contracts are sent between clubs via fax…. Yes a fax machine!

Will the chairmen start giving their managers the financial backing to succeed in? What they need to do is give their managers time and not look for a quick fix. Oxford United’s Chris Wilder and Leyton Orient’s Russell Slade are the football league’s third and forth longest serving managers, Arsene Wegner is leading the list. If you look at all three of those teams right now where do they sit in the league? At the top. 

Chopping and changing managers every other year or not putting in the financial backing for wages and players transfers will only see more clubs like Wolves, Sheffield United linger down in the depths of football for longer. Give the manager time and money to build “his” squad over two to three years and the success will come both on and off the field.

Why England Won't Win The World Cup

Another world cup is upon us and once again the nation will have high expectations for England to win football’s top prize. With qualification to Brazil 2014 in England’s own hands, now would be a good time to look at why the national team won’t be winning the Jules Rimet trophy anytime soon.

            

Since 1966, the holy year in which England did lift the trophy, managers have stated that they thought they would win the world cup. Only once has that prediction come true. Sir Alf Ramsey himself, the only manager to win the World Cup with England. Since then there have been many unsuccessful predictions of world cup glory, Ramsey himself made two. When knocked out of the tournament in 1970 Ramsey said, “we must now look ahead to the next world cup in Munich where our chances of winning I would say are very good indeed.” England failed to qualify for that tournament. Ron Greenwood in 1982 – “I honestly thought we could have won”. Glenn Hoddle in 1998 – “my innermost thought, which was that England would win the world cup.”

            

Starting with the manager, there is this expectancy that England will win the World Cup, where does this expectancy come from though?  This best quote to sum up this idea that England should be a dominant force is by Johnny Haynes of the 1958 side, “everyone in England thinks we have a God-given right to win the world cup.” It is only now that people are starting to realize that we are not some sort of divine football team who should automatically be in a final of the World Cup. One simple fact to this is that English footballers are not good enough to compete at the top level, technically and tactically.

           

For several years now fans have been criticizing that there are not enough English players in the Premiership. Some have seen that as the demise of the English national team as so few Englishmen are playing regularly in the top English teams. On failure to qualify for Euro 2008 Steven Gerrard said, “I think there is a risk of too many foreign players coming over, which would affect our national team eventually if it is not already. It is important we keep producing players.” Several important figures in the game such as Michel Platini and Sepp Blatter have also commented on the lack of Domestic players in England’s top football division. But why is there such a lack of quality English players being produced? After all the academies of the Premiership clubs are designed to nurture young English footballers and help propel them into the first team, so that the club need not spend money on a foreign talent.

            

The problem itself lies in the English way of recruiting players. England is for the most part a middle-class country, that is to say the middle classes dominate the population. Football however is a workingman’s game, or so it appears to be, and the clash in classes is what is causing to be a problem with the modern game. Education in England is becoming more and more essential and the number of people staying on after the age of 16 for higher education has been on the rise since the late 80’s. Yet football teams recruit their youth players largely from the working classes, as at 16 players with that are deemed good enough or show enough potential will be asked to leave education and become a full time youth scholar. This causes a dilemma for most of the middle-class boys as there is often pressure from their parents to stay in education and they themselves even know that the chances of turning professional are slim. This is not to say that at 16 education stops for the boys selected to play for the youth teams.  Due to EU laws they are required to partake in some sort of education. This is more often than not run by the LFE (League Football Education) and composes of a B-TEC National Diploma, or certificate in sport and leisure. This is by no means to be snubbed at, but it is nothing of the sort of education the middle classes want.

          

Football in today’s society laughs at, and is weary of the educated, therefore the middle class tend to be disregarded by the football community and the selection pool for promising talents drops in size, limiting clubs to look at the working class for their future superstars. Boys from the middles classes switch to games such as cricket, rugby and hockey, and I think it is fair to say that you can see an improvement by the national team in all these sports since the late 80’s – the same time the middle class really started to emerge. Often you now hear ex-players say of the English youngsters “they’re being over coached,” but that is like saying in a school that the pupils are being over educated. English footballers leave education at 16 as it is believed that they now have more time to fully concentrate on football, as education is only a distraction, but in theory they only train for two to three hours a day, so to say education would be a distraction is rather unjust. We can look at some players from the continent that all have had higher education and we can agree that they are world-class players; Ruud Guillt, Dennis Bergkamp, Andreas Iniesta and Socrates. Yet the football community in England is weary of educated people. 

            

Graeme Le Saux is the best example of this. At Chelsea Le Saux, spoke with rather a “posh” accent, he read broadsheet newspapers and had a passion for going to the theatre or museum. Because of this he was labeled as “gay” from his fellow professionals. This attitude taken towards Le Saux is simply because he is different in terms of education. If you look at the setups at centre of excellences and academies you will see that the majority of boys playing are from the working classes, one or two will be from the middle class but they will be subject to ridicule from the others. They will be made fun of, for the way they dress, or the taste in music and what they do for entertainment. You will also listen to a coach give a half time team talk, which will be no more than a rage.  A classic rant from coaches at half time when their team is losing is to say, “Do you want to play here? There are hundreds of lads all over the country who would die to have a chance of playing for a club like this. I could get 11 lads from the local park who would play with more passion than you lot.” You never see a coach take a game and look at it with critical thinking, we are losing, and there is clearly a problem how do we fix it. No, you see a man who believes that playing with passion and hard work is the answer.

           

Graeme Le Saux playing for England

For me this has been the biggest problem with English football, a working class background installs beliefs that to be good at something you need to have passion and commitment for the cause. If we were to look at the types of players England have recently had in their teams such as, John Terry, Jamie Carragher, Wayne Rooney and even Alan shearer would you honestly say out of all the players in the world you would pick them off their playing ability. Rooney may just fall into that category, but as for the rest what they make up for in passion and commitment they lose in technique and tactical awareness. Barcelona’s current team is composed of what is without doubt probably the most skilled team we have ever seen. Yet out of that squad how many of them would you say play with “their heart on their sleeve,” or would “give blood sweat and tears for the club.” On face value you would probably say none but technically and tactically no one else compares.

            

This is why teams such as Germany, Holland and Spain do better than the English, they are educated, and they think abut the game. Johann Cryuff famously said, “Football is a game you play with your head.” We in this country are medieval in our thinking on the game. Since Euro ’96 we haven’t come close to winning a major international competition and at this rate we aren’t getting any closer. Our arrogance and mindset of battling and “wanting it more” than the other team is what is letting us down at the top level.

           

Yes passion and commitment is nothing to be laughed at, but that alone is not good enough. Until English football starts looking at the way it plays the game from outside the box, and starts thinking about it more we are going to be left behind in the sport that we invented.

Please No Platini

Michel Platini has recently said that he needs a few months to consider whether he would take over from Sepp Blatter as head of FIFA.

Blatter himself has had a lot of criticism in his time as head of FIFA, most recently deciding to give Qatar the World Cup, but now backtracking and trying to have it played during the winter. Which would cause disrupt to the European domestic leagues.

However, although Blatter has come under a lot of criticism, the appointment of Platini could be potentially harmful for English football.

Platini who denies having any prejudice against the English when it comes to football has always seemed to hold a grudge against the inventors of the sport.

The French man has constantly been tweaking the rules of the game to make it more “European” and take away the heritage that the English rules incorporated. Financial fair play came in after Manchester City’s pursuit of Kaka in 2009.

In 2008 days before Chelsea played Juventus in the last 16, the former Juventus striker commented saying how he would love to give Juventus the Champions League in Rome.

Even with Platini holding financial fair play as one of his greatest achievements as the head of UEFA, it hasn’t stopped him from belittling Arsene Wegner before. You would think that Platini would hold the Gunner’s manager in high regard for the way in which he conducts his business in the transfer market. Yet Platini is on record as calling the fellow Frenchman “out of touch with the modern game.”

With England’s failure to make Euro 2008 was of course there own fault. Platini had no concern for seeing a ‘major nation’ miss out on an international tournament.

Why Platini has such hatred towards the English is hard to say. A gifted footballer that did well for both his nation and Juventus has seem to have always had a prejudice towards the English game and English clubs in Europe.

Head of UEFA - Michel Platini

English clubs have had a good dominance in European competitions just recently, but it appears that the tide is turning and club teams from the continent once again are domination the Champions League and Europe League. Something I’m sure that Platini will be happier to see.

If Platini were to become head of FIFA would it be detrimental to the future of the English game? Hopefully not. However, I can be certain in saying that many English fans and football based persons would not want to see him head of football’s governing body. 

Same Old England

Once again an England performance and more skepticism and negativity from the nation. The draw against Ukraine in Kiev on September 10 saw the Three Lions top group H.

However the performance, to many ex professionals, journalists and the vast majority of the public, was not satisfactory.

Roy Hodgson’s squad was depleted of a few key members due to injury and suspension. The majority of those being forwards, as Rickie Lambert was the only recognizable striker to be in the England squad for the game.

Roy Hodgson - England's Manager 

Months ago the press were stating a draw in Kiev under hostile conditions would be an excellent result, as England would be a top of the group with destiny in their own hands. Two home games at Wembley would be more than enough to see England’s through to Brazil.

Yet the manner in which England secured the point over the Ukrainians was not good enough according to these same “experts”.

I am currently in America and on the same day of England’s draw with Ukraine, the U.S secured a place in Brazil with a convincing 2-0 victory at home to Mexico.

It wasn’t the fact that the U.S qualified for the World Cup that captured my attention. Rather it was the support that the nation as a whole showed for the team that raised the hairs on my neck. The game in Columbus, Ohio finished 45 minutes before the Panama Honduras game did, a game in which as long as Panama didn’t lose, the U.S would qualify with a win.

Every single person in that Columbus stadium stayed in their seats after the final whistle of the U.S game and watched the Panama game on the big screen. Now when was the last time any England fan has done that?

After the result of the Panama game confirmed there were huge celebrations across the whole nation. The media were calling Jurgen Klinsmann a great manager and applauding the likes of Landon Donovan and Eddie Johnson for their performances during the qualifying campaign.

The problem in England is that the media are too quick to criticize. We look for the negatives and have a jab at our players for not showing enough emotion and passion. When, like the Americans, we should be getting behind our team, showing them as much support as we can.

Sir Alex Ferguson said the two greatest words ever invented were ‘well done’. Not one single media outlet has said that for England topping Group H.

If we were to actually support our team for once and not begrudge everything they do, then we might actually perform well for once.

We as a nation seem to think that we should have some God given right to be the best at football. We expect three or four nil victories every time we play. We also expect a complete performance were we retain possession like Barcelona and kill teams off, like Bayern Munich.

If we were to actually put this ego aside and support the manager and the players for once then who knows what we could achieve.

Has The Hunger Gone From Youth Players?

Pre-season is under way for most clubs and expectations for the 2013-14 season are high. Managers are looking over players to see who will fit into their plans and looking at potential transfer targets to bolster their squads.

For the youth players in the teams this will be their first experience at a real job. Second year apprentices will be hoping they can try and break into their first team, while first years will want the manager to take notice of them and maybe secure a regular reserve team spot.

It’s at this time of year, when the fans start to look at the current youth crop and begin to seek wonder kids. These are players that can bring success to their club, or who can be sold for millions and help the club grow.

But a real question that we should consider is this: do the youngsters in today’s game have hunger to be the best anymore?  The Premiership apprentices aren’t turning up to training grounds at 9 in the morning to scrub the first team player’s boots and polish them before they begin training. Instead, you now see youth team players strolling up in the latest car with a designer wash bag tucked underneath their arm.

Greats of the past such as Kevin Keegan, Kenny Daglish and Alan Hansen didn’t turn up to their respective training grounds in flashy car. They rode the public buses with the other working classes who were about to start their nine to five factory jobs.

When you are sitting on a cramped bus to get into to training early to clean boots caked in mud, before going and training for two hours in the cold and wet with hand-me-down training equipment. In those situations, of course the desire to get better is there.

Manchester United Under 18's - 1991

It’s a lot easier to get comfy in life when you are strolling up to training in a car with all the latest training gear at your call and three pairs of boots to choose from, which have all been cleaned by a boot man. Some of these 17-year-olds are earning as much in a year as some working class families.

The England U-21 side has come under a lot of criticism recently for the whole set up from the F.A. to the manager to the players. But when was the last time Connor Wickham or Thomas Ince scrubbed a players boots? How did they turn up to practice this morning? The desire to be a top footballer and work hard to make it to the top seems to be slipping out of the English game, and therefore affecting the national side.

The Manchester United youth side of the 90’s that consisted of the Neville brothers, Paul Scholes, David Beckham and Ryan Giggs didn’t make their way to the Cliff (Manchester United’s training home before Carrington) in a sports car. And they certainly didn’t jet off to a luxury Mediterranean island for a three-week training camp. Instead they were running around the local forest for fitness training and cleaning the likes of Brian McClair and Steve Bruce’s boots. And we all know how far those names have made it in the game.

At Birmingham City in 2008 Olivier Kapo gave his boot boy James McPike a $45,000 Mercedes. Needless to say McPike now plays at Kettering Town of the Evo-Stick Southern League.

I am not saying that this example alone should be enough of a reason to say that none of the youth players at the top level clubs will not go on to fame and glory. Wayne Rooney has done it at Everton to and Lionel Messi at Barcelona to name but a few.

But more often than not, the better youth players in England come from the lower league clubs, where they are not fed off a silver spoon but made to work for everything they get and for the amounts of hours they spend cleaning boots, training and running around doing things for the first team players and coaches, are on less than minimum wage.

Crewe Alexandra and Tranmere Rovers are two lower league clubs that have managed to make millions from their youth systems. Credit has to go to Dario Gradi and Warwick Rimmer in overseeing the youth programs, but the way these two clubs nurture these players is what sets up England’s youth with the right recipe to want to play for the shirt they are wearing.

Every England fan would give their left arm to play for the three lions. Now it appears that the players do not care. If you watch lower league football you will know that the players in the bottom divisions play with more passion than someone at the top. There is always more hunger to make it to the top when you’re at the bottom.

If the Premiership clubs used the old school methods of pre-season training that the lower league clubs do, then maybe we would see more passion, desire and heart from the English youngsters and make the national team a team that all the players would give everything for every time they stepped onto the pitch.

Who was the last England player you could say played with his heart on his sleeve?

How Much Is Any Player Worth?

It’s that time of year again… the summer transfer market. Fans wait anxiously to see which star-studded name their manager will sign for a record transfer fee, or who will be the bargain of the season. No matter who comes through the door, there will always be the question from the fans: is he really worth that much money?

Just recently I have started reading Soccernomics by Simon Kuper and Stefan Szymanski. This book is the football equivalent of baseball’s 'Moneyball'. It looks at how much money teams spend and if they're getting good value.

With the FIFA Confederations Cup and European Under 21 Championships taking place, I can guarantee that managers from the top divisions across Europe and around the world will have their eye on the fixtures, to see who could be a welcome addition to their squad.

If any player has an above average tournament, you’ll be sure to see the value for his services rise. Isco for example has had a standout season for Malaga and as a result, Real Madrid have snapped him up.

Kuper and Szymanski look at how clubs are going often overpay for a player in these circumstances. Yes, the youngster has had a good season in La Liga, but should Malaga be able to cash in on an extra 10 million Euros just because he plays well in a handful of Cup games?

Arsene Wegner has come under a lot of criticism for his transfer policy at Arsenal. He has seen the likes of Robin Van Persie, Patrick Viera, Thierry Henry, Cesc Fabregas and Marc Overmars all leave the Gunners and failed to really bring in players that demand a high-price tag that can improve the squad.

Kuper and Szymanksi’s take on the transfer market, is one that many people haven’t thought about before. Instead of selling players for high prices and then going out to a different club and trying to buy someone of the same caliber for just as much, if not more, why not pay your current crop of players more money?

Kuper and Symanksi’s statistics show that teams that pay higher-wages achieve higher league finishes. Just imagine how well Arsenal could have done the last 8 years, if they had offered their top players more money to stay at the club, instead of selling them and trying to buy a high-class player.

Players say they want to win trophies and that’s why they want to leave to go to a different club. But if you are getting paid more money, then it seems the trophies will follow.

Kevin Phillips right now, is in talks with Crystal Palace, saying they must meet his wage demands or he will leave the club. Nearly every team in the Championship is dying to have a proven striker like him at their club.

It may not be the most glamorous technique, but think of all the players you could still have if you just paid a bit more on wages. Of course, every player has their value, but giving players top wages and producing home grown talent is known to bring success.

So why aren't more clubs doing it?

Are Manchester City right to invest in America?

Many see Manchester City’s joint venture with the New York Yankees in creating the New York City Football Club as an excellent idea. In financial terms too, I believe that the idea of opening up football to the American audience will certainly help the City’s stature grow overseas.

But Manchester City are not only hoping to gain a bit of extra income by this business venture. They are also hoping to be able to have the first dip into the pool of young talent that is being produced in America.

But this raises the question: is investing in American football a good idea?

The United States is one of the leading countries when it comes to financially investing in youth sports. The amount of money that is pumped into sports in America in terms of coaching and facilities can’t be rivaled. Many British football teams in League 2 or League 1 would do anything to be able to have the facilities that are made available to players playing at University.

But we must take into consideration the way in which American football is set up. In England and many other countries across the world, players at the age of 16, if they are good enough, get signed to play for a club’s youth team for two or three years. In America, however, this is not necessarily the case.

Yes, Major League Soccer teams give contracts out to players at the age of 16, but many parents would rather see their child stay in school until they are 18 (the graduation age in America) and then go on to University (where they can play at the sport for another four years, while getting an education alongside playing).

The problem with this system, is the way in which the NCAA, (National Collegiate Athletic Association) the governing body of University sports, oversees football. In America, football is seen as an autumn sport, in which players playing for University teams can only play competitive matches during the months of August to December.

What player is ever going to develop if they are only playing five months of competitive football? Lionel Messi, Cristiano Ronaldo and Gareth Bale would not be the players they are if they were limited to an allotted amount of competitive play.

Even after Christmas, the NCAA put a limited amount of hours on a player being able to touch the ball. Eight hours a week and no more is the time in which players are allowed to practice, with only a handful of competitive games being allowed. There are even restrictions on how long the coaches can spend with the players. This too is carried on through the summer. Coaches are not allowed to contact University players before they start their pre-season camps.

How is limiting the amount of time someone can play a sport ever going to make American players get better?

It isn’t just the Universities that are the problem though. The system in which America tries producing their young talent clearly isn’t working. When you consider the size and population of the country, you would think there has to be at least one person who can come close to the standards of the world’s best players.

The population size could actually play a hindrance though, when the pool to choose from is simply that big there are bound to be players that will fall through the net. With the MLS being the only professional division in America, it is also very unlikely that someone like the Chicago Fire or Seattle Sounders is going to see a late bloomer in the game playing at a small club. Yet, this is the way in which Arsenal found Ian Wright.

The wide variety of sporting options that football is competing with (such as American Football, basketball, baseball and ice hockey), as well as the American culture in accepting football don’t help. But, you would think that over the last twenty years they would have been able to produce more players of a higher quality than Tim Howard, Claudio Reyna and Clint Dempsey.

With all due respect, the three players mentioned are good players, but they are not ones that you would ever jump at the chance of having in your starting eleven in a top European league.

That brings me back to the point of my article: Manchester City’s business venture. Is creating a new team going to help promote football in America and maybe produce a star that will capture the imagination of many? Or is it simply designed to help sell a few more tops in a country that thinks of football as something you throw and catch?

My personal belief is that unless there are drastic changes to the game in America, the sport will never flourish and we will not see a star come from across the pond anytime soon. Sorry City fans!