With Sunderland hiring Paolo Di Canio as manager this week,
his political affiliation has come into question. Di Canio, a perceived fascist
has caused a lot of controversy at the historic Teesside club. Left wing
politician and foreign secretary David Miliband stepped down from Sunderland’s
board of directors this week because of Di Canio’s hiring.
The question then is raised does politics belong in the beautiful game?
Politics and football is not something that is new to the
sport. Over the last 100 years there have been many counts of politics entering
the game. Whether that be right wing fascist salutes in Russia and Greece, or
politicians in Italy having control of some of the top flight clubs.
“Some people think football is a matter of life and death… I
assure you it is much, much more important than that.”
When Bill Shankly made this memorable quote he may not have
had politics in his mind but he certainly proves that you cannot underestimate
the world of football.
In 1934 a time of heightening tension throughout Europe, saw
Italy take on Austria. It is perceived that Mussolini, the Italian Dictator
handpicked the referee’s for the World cup semi-final game. Italy won the game
1-0 and went on to beat Czechoslovakia in the final. But the game itself was
one that the expression 12 men could truly be used, “The referee even played for them," said
Austrian striker Josef Bican. "When I passed for the ball out to the right
wing, one of our players, Cicek, ran for it and the referee headed it back to
the Italians. It was unbelievable." Is winning really that important in a
political sense?
Another example of politics in football was in 1958. Algeria was in a
war of independence at the same time the World cup was taking place. France
opted to give some of the Algerian players in France the opportunity of fame
and glory by playing for their national team. However when the tournament
rolled around the Algerian players fled the French National team, gathered at
the headquarters of the Front Liberation National in Tunisia and launched an
"illegal" national team, risking arrest for desertion in the process.
National Identity is something that many people feel very strongly
about, whether that is political beliefs or just the pride of being affiliated
with a nation of great history.
Was Di Canio’s Fascist salute towards the Lazio fans in 2005
then overstepping the mark? He has gone on record as saying “I’m a fascist, not
a racist” but does that still justify him to use a salute that is infamously
associated with so much evil. In his autobiography Di Canio talks of admiration
for the Italian Dictator Benito Mussolini, saying that Mussolini was simply
“misunderstood”.
Paolo Di Canio's Fascist Salute playing for Lazio in 2005
The Greek National team recently banned Giorgos
Katidis from playing international matches for life, due to his Nazi salute in
a goal celebration. This is the first stance we have seen from a football
governing body in relation to political views. In a sport where racism,
homophobia and sexism are not treated with enough respect, is fascism going to
be added to the list of concerns not tackled in the game?
Maybe football is more than a matter of life and death,
maybe it is a sport that is simply bigger than everything else.
No comments:
Post a Comment